InfoScale™ 9.0 Storage Foundation and High Availability Configuration and Upgrade Guide - Linux
- Section I. Introduction to SFHA
- Section II. Configuration of SFHA
- Preparing to configure
- Preparing to configure SFHA clusters for data integrity
- About planning to configure I/O fencing
- Setting up the CP server
- Configuring the CP server manually
- Configuring CP server using response files
- Configuring SFHA
- Configuring Storage Foundation High Availability using the installer
- Configuring a secure cluster node by node
- Completing the SFHA configuration
- Verifying and updating licenses on the system
- Configuring Storage Foundation High Availability using the installer
- Configuring SFHA clusters for data integrity
- Setting up disk-based I/O fencing using installer
- Setting up server-based I/O fencing using installer
- Manually configuring SFHA clusters for data integrity
- Setting up disk-based I/O fencing manually
- Setting up server-based I/O fencing manually
- Configuring server-based fencing on the SFHA cluster manually
- Setting up non-SCSI-3 fencing in virtual environments manually
- Setting up majority-based I/O fencing manually
- Performing an automated SFHA configuration using response files
- Performing an automated I/O fencing configuration using response files
- Section III. Upgrade of SFHA
- Planning to upgrade SFHA
- Preparing to upgrade SFHA
- Upgrading Storage Foundation and High Availability
- Performing a rolling upgrade of SFHA
- Performing a phased upgrade of SFHA
- About phased upgrade
- Performing a phased upgrade using the product installer
- Performing an automated SFHA upgrade using response files
- Upgrading SFHA using YUM
- Performing post-upgrade tasks
- Post-upgrade tasks when VCS agents for VVR are configured
- About enabling LDAP authentication for clusters that run in secure mode
- Planning to upgrade SFHA
- Section IV. Post-installation tasks
- Section V. Adding and removing nodes
- Adding a node to SFHA clusters
- Adding the node to a cluster manually
- Adding a node using response files
- Configuring server-based fencing on the new node
- Removing a node from SFHA clusters
- Removing a node from a SFHA cluster
- Removing a node from a SFHA cluster
- Adding a node to SFHA clusters
- Section VI. Configuration and upgrade reference
- Appendix A. Installation scripts
- Appendix B. SFHA services and ports
- Appendix C. Configuration files
- Appendix D. Configuring the secure shell or the remote shell for communications
- Appendix E. Sample SFHA cluster setup diagrams for CP server-based I/O fencing
- Appendix F. Configuring LLT over UDP
- Using the UDP layer for LLT
- Manually configuring LLT over UDP using IPv4
- Using the UDP layer of IPv6 for LLT
- Manually configuring LLT over UDP using IPv6
- About configuring LLT over UDP multiport
- Appendix G. Using LLT over RDMA
- Configuring LLT over RDMA
- Configuring RDMA over an Ethernet network
- Configuring RDMA over an InfiniBand network
- Tuning system performance
- Manually configuring LLT over RDMA
- Troubleshooting LLT over RDMA
About deciding the order of existing coordination points
You can decide the order in which coordination points can participate in a race during a network partition. In a network partition scenario, I/O fencing attempts to contact coordination points for membership arbitration based on the order that is set in the vxfentab
file.
When I/O fencing is not able to connect to the first coordination point in the sequence it goes to the second coordination point and so on. To avoid a cluster panic, the surviving subcluster must win majority of the coordination points. So, the order must begin with the coordination point that has the best chance to win the race and must end with the coordination point that has the least chance to win the race.
For fencing configurations that use a mix of coordination point servers and coordination disks, you can specify either coordination point servers before coordination disks or disks before servers.
Note:
Disk-based fencing does not support setting the order of existing coordination points.
Considerations to decide the order of coordination points
Choose the coordination points based on their chances to gain membership on the cluster during the race and hence gain control over a network partition. In effect, you have the ability to save a partition.
First in the order must be the coordination point that has the best chance to win the race. The next coordination point you list in the order must have relatively lesser chance to win the race. Complete the order such that the last coordination point has the least chance to win the race.